Heated Rivalry: A Defining Moment for Queer Representation—and Beyond

Editor's Note: This show includes sexual situations between consenting adults.

---

By: Camryn Aitken

Canada’s latest contribution to the greater good of society—Crave’s Heated Rivalry—has taken the world of queer media by storm in one of the most unexpected smash-hit TV successes of the year. If you somehow haven’t heard of this booming show (and I’m guessing you have), it centers on two rival hockey players, Ilya Rozanov and Shane Hollander, and their secret, decade-long romance. 

I personally really enjoyed the show. I loved the cinematography, the soundtrack, and the layered and deliberate character development. I believe that it offers a rare, emotionally resonant queer romance.

I don’t believe its success stems only from its connection to the queer community. At its core, the show taps into something far more universal: the deeply human desire to know another person—and to be known in return. 

The show was renewed for season two just two-thirds of the way through its first season—and the statistics within the past week alone have been insane: 

• It is currently the #1 show on HBO Max, surpassing I Love LA and It: Welcome to Derry.

• Episode 5 of Heated Rivalry skyrocketed to the top of IMDB ratings to tie Breaking Bad as the highest-rated TV episode of all time.

• Lead actors Hudson Williams and Connor Storrie have gained hundreds of thousands of followers on social media and now have other 800 thousand followers each.

Yet, as the series has filled my feed, I’ve found myself increasingly frustrated with the discourse surrounding it. In an effort to define Heated Rivalry, much of the media coverage has fixated almost entirely on the sex. Words like “smutty,” “steamy,” and “graphic” dominate headlines, reducing the show to its most sensational elements while ignoring all the other aspects of the series. Yet, while I can't refute that yes, the show does include a lot of sexual elements, I argue that the sex aspect is not the sole–or even primary–reason for its popularity.

The series succeeds not because it shows sex, but because it integrates sex as a meaningful, critical component of a well-executed romance. Shane and Ilya’s relationship begins with physical attraction and evolves through tense, urgent hookups. As creator Jacob Tierney explained in an interview with Vulture, “Sex is their language, their way of communicating.” To censor that aspect would not make the show unsuccessful—it would make an incomplete narrative. It reflects two men who initially lack the emotional vocabulary to articulate what they feel, using physical closeness as their first form of honesty.

At the same time, the show’s success cannot be attributed solely to queer representation. A significant portion of the audience consists of straight women, and that is not accidental. By removing women from the central romantic dynamic, the series removes the familiar gendered power imbalances that often structure heterosexual relationships in media. Viewers—particularly women—get to watch two men navigate vulnerability, communication, and emotional growth on their own. In a cultural moment when many people question whether modern love is broken, Heated Rivalry presents intimacy not as a fairy tale, but as something slow-burning, hard-earned, messy, and transformative.

Of course, however, the show would not be the widespread hit it is without its queer representation. On TikTok alone, thousands of athletes have been posting in response to the show and mourning the representation they wish they had in high school, college, and professional leagues. Recently, Jesse Kortue—who grew up playing hockey but eventually walked away out of fear that he couldn’t reconcile his athletic career with his sexuality—came out publicly and credited Heated Rivalry for inspiring him. Kortue stated, “Never in my life did I think something so positive and loving could come from such a masculine sport.” Considering this, the significance of the series becomes even clearer. The show does more than offer a compelling romance; it challenges long-standing assumptions about who belongs in hypermasculine spaces. In doing so, it creates an opportunity for queer individuals—whether they are athletes, hockey players specifically, or none of the above—to see themselves reflected in popular media without shame, fear, or compromise.

Heated Rivalry reminds us of what is possible when media creates this kind of space—where queer stories are not sidelined or softened, and actually thrive, centered in the same scale, seriousness, and emotional depth as any other romance. It shows what can happen when creators trust their audiences to handle complexity—the messy, passionate, vulnerable moments that make us human. When the media truly invests in its queer characters—granting them depth and complexity rather than reducing them to tropes—we begin to see the full, widespread impact stories like Heated Rivalry can have. These stories resonate not because they are labeled as “queer,” but because they are honest, layered, and deeply human.

And in doing so, it sets a new standard: not just for queer television, but storytelling as a whole.